Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Volkswagen Touran 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |