Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Opel Meriva. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara Picasso and Opel Meriva are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Meriva has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 455 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |