Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 12 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |