Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Combo 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`815 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
| |