Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Combo 2004

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2006
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP70 HP
Torque: 240 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds17 seconds
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Opel Combo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1200 km on highway
880 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.32 m
Width: 1.75 m1.69 m
Height: 1.64 m1.80 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Combo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 22002200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv