Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2006
Ford Tourneo
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP110 HP
Torque: 240 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds13.2 seconds
Citroen Xsara Picasso and Ford Tourneo have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara Picasso torque is 10 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1150 km on highway
880 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.57 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.64 m1.98 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 34 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3002`330
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 16005600
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv