Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2006
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP120 HP
Torque: 240 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds10.8 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 75 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.97.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
880 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.33 m
Width: 1.75 m1.82 m
Height: 1.64 m1.60 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1620 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`300 kg1`950 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16002200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv