Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |