Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 10 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |