Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 70 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 205 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | 11.3 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.7 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 190 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |