Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 80 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 205 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.7 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 11 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |