Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 205 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.7 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |