Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 205 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.7 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`250 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |