Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 137 HP | 70 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 125 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 15 seconds | 8 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.7 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, a Citroen Xsara Picasso with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 190 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |