Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 137 HP | 80 - 160 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 132 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 15 seconds | 8.5 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.7 | 4.7 - 7.6 | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf Plus. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 395 litres | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Plus. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf Plus, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`984 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | high | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
| |