Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Renault Scenic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 137 HP | 80 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 15 seconds | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.7 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 120 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |