Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford Fusion 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 137 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 110 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 15 seconds | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.7 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fusion. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 26 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1175 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 213 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |