Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 137 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 15 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.7 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Citroen Xsara Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Xsara Picasso has 50 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
| |