Citroen Xantia 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 131 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Citroen Xantia engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.4 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1610 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`955 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | low | |
Citroen Xantia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |