Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Kia Clarus 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 123 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Clarus is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Clarus, but torque is 5 NM more than Kia Clarus. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.1 | |
|
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Clarus, which means that by driving the Citroen Xantia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Clarus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |