Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Subaru Outback 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 99 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xantia consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Citroen Xantia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xantia consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.58 m | |
| Citroen Xantia and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |