Citroen Xantia 1997 vs Subaru Outback 1998
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 15 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.5 | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.58 m | |
| Citroen Xantia is 28 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |