Citroen Xantia 1995 vs Subaru Outback 1998
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 223 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xantia engine produces 4 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xantia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xantia consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.58 m | |
Citroen Xantia is 28 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 2`015 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |