Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Mazda 626 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 117 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Citroen Xantia is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xantia engine produces 38 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.0 | |
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
Citroen Xantia is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xantia, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |