Citroen Xantia 1996 vs Mazda 626 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 76 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.6 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Citroen Xantia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Xantia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Vitara | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
Citroen Xantia is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`715 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xantia, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |