Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xantia is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xantia engine produces 32 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xantia is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xantia is 12 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Citroen Xantia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |