Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 59 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.0 | |
|
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Citroen Xantia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
| Citroen Xantia is 8 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xantia is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |