Citroen Xantia 1997 vs Mercedes E class 1993
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xantia engine produces 46 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xantia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Citroen Xantia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xantia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen Xantia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
Citroen Xantia is 30 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Citroen Xantia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Citroen Xantia quality could be a bit better. | ||
Average price (€): | 600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |