Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Volkswagen Vento 1993
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xantia is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xantia engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xantia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xantia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Vento engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Vento engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xantia is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xantia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |