Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Kia Shuma 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 123 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Citroen Xantia engine produces 12 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Kia Shuma. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.5 | |
| Citroen Xantia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xantia is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xantia is 4 cm longer than the Kia Shuma, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |