Citroen Xantia 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.1 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 90 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 250 NM | 138 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 18 seconds | 8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 10.3 | 6.7 - 10.3 | |
|
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Citroen Xantia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`953 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |