Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Volvo V70 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen Xantia
1998 - 2001
Volvo V70
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Citroen Xantia is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.12.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 75 - 150 HP126 - 265 HP
Torque: 135 - 250 NM170 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 - 18 seconds6.8 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.36.3 - 12.2
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Citroen Xantia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1580 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`450~ 1`994
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xantia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv