Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Kia Clarus 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.1 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 250 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 18 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.3 | 9.3 - 11.1 | |
|
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Clarus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`846 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |