Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 194 HP | 65 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 267 NM | 114 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 23.6 seconds | 8.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.6 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Citroen Xantia equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| Citroen Xantia and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`253 | ~ 1`641 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Renault Megane has
| |