Citroen Xantia 1993 vs Mazda 626 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 194 HP | 76 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 267 NM | 157 - 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 23.6 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.6 | 6.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Citroen Xantia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
| Citroen Xantia is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`253 | ~ 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |