Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen Xantia
1998 - 2001
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2003
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.91.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 75 - 194 HP90 - 226 HP
Torque: 135 - 267 NM165 - 330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 17.6 seconds7.4 - 12.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 11.65.7 - 10.7
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, a Citroen Xantia with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Mondeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.73 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.38 m1.43 m
Citroen Xantia is smaller.
Citroen Xantia is 21 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`461~ 1`939
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xantia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv