Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 194 HP | 90 - 226 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 267 NM | 165 - 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17.6 seconds | 7.4 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 11.6 | 5.7 - 10.7 | |
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, a Citroen Xantia with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
Citroen Xantia is smaller. Citroen Xantia is 21 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`461 | ~ 1`939 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |