Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Kia Shuma 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Citroen Xantia is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 194 HP | 88 - 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 267 NM | 135 - 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17.6 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 11.6 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xantia is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xantia is 4 cm longer than the Kia Shuma, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`461 | ~ 1`627 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |