Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Citroen SpaceTourer and Citroen C4 Picasso have the same engine power, but Citroen SpaceTourer torque is 30 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Citroen SpaceTourer reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen SpaceTourer could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen SpaceTourer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is larger. Citroen SpaceTourer is 88 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1384 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer has more luggage capacity. Citroen SpaceTourer has 847 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen SpaceTourer is 1.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Citroen SpaceTourer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |