Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is more dynamic to drive. Citroen SpaceTourer engine produces 37 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Citroen SpaceTourer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Citroen SpaceTourer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Galaxy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland, Citroen C5 Aircross | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen SpaceTourer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is larger. Citroen SpaceTourer is 14 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer has more luggage capacity. Citroen SpaceTourer has 213 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen SpaceTourer is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Citroen SpaceTourer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`770 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |