Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Citroen SpaceTourer engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Despite the higher power, Citroen SpaceTourer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen SpaceTourer could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Citroen SpaceTourer can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Citroen SpaceTourer version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen SpaceTourer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is larger. Citroen SpaceTourer is 56 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 13 cm wider, while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer has more luggage capacity. Citroen SpaceTourer has 103 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen SpaceTourer (by 1979 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen SpaceTourer is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Citroen SpaceTourer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |