Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is more dynamic to drive. Citroen SpaceTourer and Renault Grand Scenic have the same engine power, but Citroen SpaceTourer torque is 30 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Citroen SpaceTourer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen SpaceTourer consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen SpaceTourer could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen SpaceTourer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 117 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Citroen SpaceTourer can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Citroen SpaceTourer version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen SpaceTourer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is larger. Citroen SpaceTourer is 33 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 189 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 189 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 798 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen SpaceTourer is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen SpaceTourer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 2`367 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |