Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (diesel) | 1.6 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 177 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 400 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 18.5 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.2 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, Citroen SpaceTourer equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.03 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer is larger. Citroen SpaceTourer is 21 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1384 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer has more luggage capacity. Citroen SpaceTourer has 994 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen SpaceTourer is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Citroen SpaceTourer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`846 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |