Citroen SpaceTourer 2016 vs Peugeot Traveller 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 177 HP | 95 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 400 NM | 210 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 18.5 seconds | 10.1 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.2 | 5.2 - 6.2 | |
|
On average, Citroen SpaceTourer equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot Traveller. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.03 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.88 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen SpaceTourer is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot Traveller, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen SpaceTourer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1384 litres | 798 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3968 litres | 3100 litres | |
|
Citroen SpaceTourer has more luggage capacity. Citroen SpaceTourer has 586 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot Traveller. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen SpaceTourer (by 868 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`846 | ~ 2`766 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen SpaceTourer has
|
| |