Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Opel Meriva 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Opel Meriva is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 42 HP less power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Opel Meriva. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 33 cm shorter than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Opel Meriva has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.5 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Meriva scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Meriva scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |