Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Plus, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Plus. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Plus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Nemo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf Plus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.59 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, 26 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 395 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Plus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Plus, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
| |