Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 17.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Nemo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Caddy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.86 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 45 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 23 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 200 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Caddy scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |