Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Toyota Verso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 89 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Nemo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 32 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 623 litres | |
|
Toyota Verso has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 70 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |