Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008

 
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Toyota Urban Cruiser
2008 - 2014
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP90 HP
Torque: 160 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18 seconds11.7 seconds
Toyota Urban Cruiser is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Nemo engine produces 22 HP less power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.6
Citroen Nemo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
Citroen Nemo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.93 m
Width: 2.02 m1.73 m
Height: 1.72 m1.53 m
Citroen Nemo is larger.
Citroen Nemo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 29 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres314 litres
Citroen Nemo has more luggage capacity.
Citroen Nemo has 46 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
Turning diameter: 10 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`625
Safety:
Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28005400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Nemo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv