Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Peugeot Bipper 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 16.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 7 HP less power than Peugeot Bipper, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Peugeot Bipper. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Citroen Nemo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Nemo and Peugeot Bipper are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 884 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot Bipper, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Peugeot Bipper has
| |