Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Opel Combo 2004

 
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP70 HP
Torque: 160 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18 seconds17 seconds
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Nemo engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Combo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.55.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1200 km on highway
830 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m4.32 m
Width: 2.02 m1.69 m
Height: 1.72 m1.80 m
Citroen Nemo is 36 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 33 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres455 litres
Opel Combo has more luggage space.
Citroen Nemo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`815
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28002400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Nemo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Combo has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv