Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Opel Combo 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Combo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
Citroen Nemo is 36 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 33 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 455 litres | |
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`815 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |