Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Nemo engine produces 47 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Citroen Nemo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Citroen Nemo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Nemo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 63 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 27 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1485 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 5, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |